Should those of us who have lunch after 1:30 p.m. automatically expect bad service? What happens during those awkward hours between 1-5 p.m. that causes the customer service — inside establishments that are in spite of appearances open for business — to take a siesta? I posed the former question today as I lunched with my husband, a hardworking restaurant manager whom I seldom see during daylight hours, as we sat in front of empty glasses and dirty dishes waiting to pay our bill all the while watching our waitress chat on the phone behind the bar at Scalini’s in Lakewood.
“No,” he assures me, “you should expect good service — not only does the server left on duty have little else to do but wait on a few late lunchers, but in fact the server left on duty is the closer and should be among the strongest on staff to garner that particular responsibility.”
But as a customer, when I’m eating at 2 p.m. (which I normally do sitting at my desk for this very reason) even at a place that won’t close until 10 p.m., I often feel as if I am an afterthought at best, or that by my mere patronage, I’m impeding on the wait staff’s opportunity to catch up on side work, smoke break or socialization.
As for Scalini’s, the food was good and came out promptly — the Chicken Parmesan Sandwich was moist yet crispy and flavorful.
I had coffee, asked for cream and didn’t get it until long after my java had cooled.
I can forgive the occasional forgetfulness (even when there is more staff than customers around) but that was just one of several little omissions that let me know my business was in no way important to her — i.e. drinks weren’t refilled barring a specific request. Though we had crab claws (delicious by the way) dripping in butter I was never offered an extra napkin. We were sharing but never given appetizer plates — she was polite enough, but these are things a guest should never have to ask for. As my husband says, the server’s job is to anticipate these types of obvious needs.
If I were the manager — a story like this would bother me more than say a rude or totally incompetent waiter. With extreme incompetence, the manager is usually informed and thus gets the opportunity to make the unhappy customer happy. But when a customer is met with mediocrity and indifference, they just leave quietly and don’t return. And they tell their friends (or readers) about their experience.
I love Scalini's and eat there often, but you have hit on a sensitive issue for me also. Recently, we went for a very late dinner, shortly before the restaurant was to close. It was almost empty, yet it took a long time to get the food ordered and delivered. The beer I wanted with my pizza never made it at all.
I finally had to go to the counter and interrupt the gaggle of socializing employees in order to get my check. I am sure your husband would want to know if any of his customers had such an experience. I, however, did not say anything to management because we have not had that kind of problem there in the past. It will not deter me from returning. Now that you have also had such an experience, I hope they get the word soon.
Posted by: Norman Alston | Jul 08, 2008 at 05:03 PM
In the past 5 years, I have eaten at, or had take-out from Scalini's probably 100 times. I cannot think of a single instance when the service was bad. Occasionally slow because the restaurant was packed, but not once egregiously inattentive. Sorry you had a bad experience, but that's not the norm for Scalini's.
Posted by: Observist | Jul 08, 2008 at 06:26 PM
When any restaurant is busy, the servers are constantly in circulation and able to check all their tables continuously. When it's slow and they just have one table to watch, they can either stand there and stare at you the whole time, or find something else to do or someone to talk to, and are more likely to get distracted. That's obviously not the pinnacle of professionalism, but we're talking about a casual neighborhood place with an average entree less than $10, not Le Cirque.
Posted by: Observist | Jul 08, 2008 at 06:41 PM
This snippy litle tirade is just silly. You've taken a lousy experience and universalized it. I also go for lunch outside peak hours at places all over town, and I've never had an encounter such as the one you describe. Get over it.
Posted by: Lee G. | Jul 08, 2008 at 06:58 PM
I frequent Scalini's as well. Though I never feel they pay attention fully to their customers. Angelo's on the other hand are always appreciative.
Posted by: Will Silverthorn | Jul 08, 2008 at 11:23 PM
I like the food at Scalini’s and I wouldn’t totally object to eating there again — I’d certainly get take out. But the thing is, there are so many restaurants trying to succeed in Dallas — so even more than say … Le Cirque, I’d assume the small neighborhood places, especially in this economic climate, would have more to gain by being at their very best during all operating hours. Restaurants all over town are closing from 2-5 (off hours) or on slow days as they are looking to cut costs. So if Scalini’s or any other is going to choose to stay open they should go all out for those customers during slow stretches.
Insofar as this being a “snippy tirade” … you talkin’ to me? I thought I was pretty fair. As for “universalizing” the incident — I was just mustering up a guess based on meandering experiences as to why nice folks at a by and large reputable spot might have been slackin’ off. It's fine to disagree (Lord knows enough people do) but I don't see the need for such an angry tone, Mr. "G.".
Posted by: Christina Hughes-Babb | Jul 09, 2008 at 01:22 PM
Maybe the problem is a surplus of narcissistic young women who, as customers, expect to be treated exactly as they want at all times, and as servers, can't be bothered to let their jobs interfere with their social lives. ;-)
Posted by: Observist | Jul 10, 2008 at 10:58 AM